ILUVIEN® in diabetic macular edema that persists or recurs despite treatment: Results from the Retina.pt® RIVER audit.

PURPOSE: Persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) remains a problem in clinical practice, with many patients having a suboptimal response to the standard of care (SOC). Evidence supports the long-term efficacy of intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant (ILUVIEN®) in patients that have responded sub-optimally, although there is still scarce data from real-world Portuguese practices. We aimed to monitor the current SOC in selected Portuguese practices prior to FAc implantation and then assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of the FAc implant. SETTINGS: The study included patient data from five Portuguese public hospitals. DESIGN: This was a non-interventional, multicenter audit of data collected from Retina.pt registry from patients with persistent or recurrent DME despite treatment. METHODS: Outcome measures included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP). Results were compared at regular times over 36 months. RESULTS: This study included 222 eyes from 152 patients. A significant decrease in BCVA (P < 0.001) and a significant increase in CMT (P = 0.013) were observed prior to FAc. A significant increase in BCVA was registered at 6 months after FAc implant administration (P < 0.001), which was maintained during follow-up. No relevant changes in IOP were observed. Treatment burden was reduced as a result of treatment with FAc (P < 0.001 for anti-VEGF, corticosteroids, or both treatments) in the full population. CONCLUSIONS: In Portuguese practice, data showed that pre-FAc implantation, some patients did not respond to SOC treatment and/or they were undertreated. Following FAc implant administration, there were rapid, sustained, long-term visual and anatomical improvements, and a marked reduction in treatment burden.

The 2021 Portuguese Society of Ophthalmology joint guidelines with Paediatric Rheumatology on the screening, monitoring and medical treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis.

AIM: To develop the first Ophthalmology joint guidelines with Paediatric Rheumatology with recommendations on the screening, monitoring and medical treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis (JIA-U), endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Ophthalmology (SPO). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to include publications up to July 14th 2020, with no language restrictions, in order to include all the international position papers/guidelines concerning the medical management of JIA-U and randomised clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of medical treatment in this field. We searched through MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The Delphi modified technique to generate consensus was used. Preliminary evidence statements were subject to an anonymous agreement assessment and discussion process using an online survey, followed by further discussion and update at a national meeting. A draft of the manuscript with all recommendations was then circulated among all participants and suggestions were incorporated. The final version was again circulated before publication. RESULTS: Twenty-six recommendations were developed focusing on the following topics: general management (3), screening and follow-up of uveitis (4), treatment (17) and health education in JIA-U among patients and families (2). CONCLUSION: These guidelines were designed to support the shared medical management of patients with JIA-U and emphasize the need for a multidisciplinary approach between Ophthalmology and Paediatric Rheumatology regarding the comprehensive care of JIA-U. We acknowledge that updating these recommendations will be warranted in the future, as more evidence becomes available. KEY-WORDS: juvenile idiopathic arthritis, uveitis, biological treatment, conventional immunosuppressive treatment, multidisciplinary management, guidelines, consensus, review, Delphi Technique.

Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema in the Real-World Clinical Setting in Portugal: A Multicentre Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 2-year outcome of ranibizumab for diabetic macular oedema (DME) in the real-life clinical practice of five ophthalmology departments of the National Health Service (NHS) in Portugal. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicentre study. The clinical records on consecutive patients with DME from clinical practice treated with 0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab and followed up for 24 months were reviewed. Efficacy outcomes comprised the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) evaluated by SD-OCT. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to explore predictors of BCVA. RESULTS: A total of 122 eyes of 93 patients were included. The median BCVA change by 24 months was +5.0 letters (IQR 12.0) (p < 0.001) and the CMT change was -89.0 µm (IQR 165.0) (p < 0.001). By 24 months, 21.4% of the eyes had gained ≥15 letters and 8.6% had lost ≥15 letters. The median number of injections given during follow-up was 5.0 (IQR 4.0). A greater baseline CMT and a more disrupted status of the external limiting membrane were predictive of worse BCVA at 24 months (p ≤ 0.015). CONCLUSION: DME treatment with ranibizumab in the Portuguese NHS is associated with anatomic and functional improvement by 2 years; however, our results are below those reported in major clinical trials, and undertreatment is probably the cause.

Safety of bilateral same-day intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents.

PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate the safety of bilateral same-day injections with intravitreal antiangiogenic drugs for macular diseases. METHODS: Cross-sectional retrospective review of unilateral and bilateral same-day antiangiogenic injections was conducted between January 2011 and March 2016 in the Unit of Macula, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe (Valencia, Spain). A total of 8,172 injections were administered, among which 6,560 were unilateral and 1,612 were bilateral injections. Patients were included in the study regardless of the diagnosis. Ranibizumab and aflibercept were the antiangiogenic drugs used. The presence of endophthalmitis or retinal detachment was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1 (0.012%) culture-proven endophthalmitis and 19 (0.233%) acute intraocular inflammations were registered. In the unilateral injections group, there were 18 (0.274%) acute intraocular inflammations and 1 (0.015%) culture-proven endophthalmitis. One (0.062%) of the 1,612 bilateral same-day injections had a unilateral acute intraocular inflammation, and there were no culture-proven endophthalmitis in this group. CONCLUSION: Bilateral same-day injections are more convenient for patients and their caregivers than the unilateral injections administered on different days. In our study, the prevalence of culture-proven endophthalmitis and acute intraocular inflammation was lower in the bilateral injections than in the unilateral group. These data support the idea that bilateral same-day injections are a safe and valid treatment to use in our clinical practice.

Photoscreening for amblyogenic risk factors in 1-year-olds: results from a single center in Portugal over a 9-year period.

PURPOSE: To report the experience of a single center in photoscreening 1-year-olds for amblyogenic risk factors over a 9-year period and to estimate amblyopia prevalence in this population. METHODS: The records of 11,029 children 11-18 months of age who were screened for amblyogenic risk factors at Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga between 2004 and 2012 were reviewed. Measurements were performed with MTI (until 2008) and plusoptiX S04 (from 2009). The screening results were evaluated according to criteria adapted from Donahue and colleagues. RESULTS: The screening was negative in 8,985 children (82%), positive in 519 (5%), unreadable in 201 (2%), and borderline in 1,324 (12%). The overall positive predictive value (PPV) for the presence of at least one amblyogenic risk factor was 56.8%. The estimated prevalence of meaningful refractive errors in this population was 2.2%; of strabismus, 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of unreadable screenings was low. The overall PPV was lower than other large studies, at older ages, but higher than those of the same-age children. Considering the potential benefits of early intervention in preventing the development of amblyopia, this study demonstrates the feasibility of screening 1-year-olds.